Home » Myanmar Publications » Should Myanmar Join the International Convention for the Settlement of Investment Disputes?
Should Myanmar Join the International Convention for the Settlement of Investment Disputes?
April 25, 2017In an investment dispute between a foreign investor and the Government of the Union of Myanmar, there are several institutions and rules which can be used.
Highlights of this note
- What Are the Pros and Cons of ICSID Arbitration for Myanmar Compared to Non-ICSID Arbitration
- Myanmar’s Dispute Settlement Mechanisms in Existing Investment Treaties
- Will Myanmar Be Overwhelmed With Claims After Joining ICSID?
- Why Do India, Thailand and Vietnam Not Join Icsid, and Why Did Venezuala, Ecuador and Bolivia Leave?
- Conclusions and Recommendations
KEYWORDS
RELATED EXPERIENCES
Related Articles
- New MIC Permit or Endorsement to Be Issued to Businesses Suffering Fire Damage in Myanmar
- September 17, 2021 - Temporary Relaxation of Licensing Requirements for the Importation of Liquid Oxygen, Medicine, and Medical Equipment Necessary for COVID-19 Treatment and Prevention
- July 30, 2021 - VDB Loi Litigation Team Bags Historic Win: First Myanmar Court Enforcement of Foreign Verdict in Major Arbitration Case
- May 25, 2021 - Share Transfers in Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar and Vietnam: Capital Gains Tax Perils, Registration Pitfalls, and Offshore Indirect Transfers
- May 20, 2021 - Temporary Relaxation of Licensing Requirement for Importation and Exportation of Certain Goods in Myanmar
- March 10, 2021